The method that reads language, myth, and society as systems of differences whose hidden structures shape what can be said and thought.
Structuralism rose in the middle of the twentieth century from Ferdinand de Saussure's linguistics, through Claude Lévi-Strauss's anthropology, into nearly every human science. Its claim is that the elements of a culture mean what they mean by their places in a system, not by themselves. Post-structuralism, its heir and critic in Derrida, Foucault, and others, kept the method and unsettled its confidence, arguing that the structures themselves slip, differ, and defer.
Sources
Primary
- Claude Lévi-Strauss, Structural Anthropology (1958).
Secondary
- John Sturrock, Structuralism (1986).
How this compares to Christianity
How does this branch relate to the historic Christian faith?
This assessment has not yet been reviewed. Every verdict below stands at Not yet reviewed until the named theological reviewers supply it.
- Does it consider itself Christian?
- Not yet reviewed
- Did it arise from the Christian tradition?
- Not yet reviewed
- Does it affirm the ecumenical creeds?
- Not yet reviewed
- Is it recognized as Christian by the historic bodies?
- the Catholic Church: Not yet reviewed
- the Eastern Orthodox Church: Not yet reviewed
- the Oriental Orthodox churches: Not yet reviewed
- conciliar Protestant bodies: Not yet reviewed
- the WCC / National Council of Churches: Not yet reviewed
- This site's assessment
- Not yet reviewed
- Reviewer
- Not yet reviewed. The theological reviewers are named on the criteria page when they are appointed.
The comparative record for this entity, its points of convergence and divergence across the ten loci, has not yet been populated. It stands in the assessment queue on the criteria page.
What this assessment cannot settle
This assessment determines what this entity teaches and how that teaching relates to the historic Christian creeds. It does not determine whether any person is saved, whether God accepts their worship, whether they are sincere, or whether the criteria applied here are correct.
This assessment is made from the standpoint described in our editorial statement and our criteria page. It reports classifications; it does not rank sincerity, spiritual standing, or the eternal state of any person.