Branch under Secular and Non-Theistic Worldviews · 0 divisions below · part of Secular and Non-Theistic Worldviews

Aristotelianism

The system of Aristotle: knowledge begins in the senses, things are form in matter, and every nature aims at its end.

Aristotelianism is the work of the Lyceum become a tradition: logic as the instrument of all inquiry, nature read through form and end, ethics as the habit of virtue, and the city as the setting of the good life. Preserved and commented by Arabic and Jewish scholars when the Greek text was scarce in the West, it returned to shape the universities of Europe. Its categories still underlie common sense wherever causes are sorted and ends are weighed.

Sources

Primary

  • Aristotle, Metaphysics.

Secondary

  • Jonathan Barnes, editor, The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle (1995).

How this compares to Christianity

How does this branch relate to the historic Christian faith?

This assessment has not yet been reviewed. Every verdict below stands at Not yet reviewed until the named theological reviewers supply it.

Does it consider itself Christian?
Not yet reviewed
Did it arise from the Christian tradition?
Not yet reviewed
Does it affirm the ecumenical creeds?
Not yet reviewed
Is it recognized as Christian by the historic bodies?
  • the Catholic Church: Not yet reviewed
  • the Eastern Orthodox Church: Not yet reviewed
  • the Oriental Orthodox churches: Not yet reviewed
  • conciliar Protestant bodies: Not yet reviewed
  • the WCC / National Council of Churches: Not yet reviewed
This site's assessment
Not yet reviewed
Reviewer
Not yet reviewed. The theological reviewers are named on the criteria page when they are appointed.

The comparative record for this entity, its points of convergence and divergence across the ten loci, has not yet been populated. It stands in the assessment queue on the criteria page.

What this assessment cannot settle

This assessment determines what this entity teaches and how that teaching relates to the historic Christian creeds. It does not determine whether any person is saved, whether God accepts their worship, whether they are sincere, or whether the criteria applied here are correct.

This assessment is made from the standpoint described in our editorial statement and our criteria page. It reports classifications; it does not rank sincerity, spiritual standing, or the eternal state of any person.