Search pages, essays, world views, libraries, and topics. Type at least two characters.
CCWV.LIFE
Support This Site
Accounts of what is real, each set out in its own terms and each with its own page.
All World Views Does God Exist? The Worldview Tree Browse All Entities The Schism Register The Diptych: Compare The Christian AssessmentInstruments for working with the collection: set two worldviews side by side, read an entity against the Christian faith, trace a tradition through its divisions, and search the whole site.
All Tools The Diptych: CompareMetrics
This page reports how completely the site has documented its subject, how well it has sourced its claims, and where its gaps stand. The numbers measure the site's own work against its own standards. They never measure, score, or rank the traditions the site describes.
Last computed October 31, 2026 at 04:12 UTC. Definitions version 1.0.
| Level 1, world views | 13 |
|---|---|
| Level 2, branches | 53 |
| Level 3, families | 33 |
| Level 4, bodies and schools | 78 |
| Level 5, movements | 3 |
An entity count describes the shape of the site's own registry. It says nothing about the size or standing of any tradition in the world.
| History events | 579 |
|---|---|
| Notable Triads | 105 |
| Favorite Scripture | 30 |
| FAQ | 17 |
| Traditions | 24 |
| News | 9 |
| Impact Today | 5 |
A post count measures the archive's volume, not its completeness; a section can hold many posts and still lack whole subjects.
| Apologetics | 20 |
|---|---|
| Bioethics | 7 |
| Christian World View | 9 |
| Creation | 15 |
| Ethics and Moral Theology | 11 |
| General Theology | 6 |
| Science | 8 |
The register counts the works the site has formally cited. It is not a bibliography of the subject, and inclusion is not an endorsement of a work's conclusions.
Target: 100% documented in full
This number measures the completeness of the site's own history documentation. It is not a measure of any world view's history, importance, or truth.
Target: At least 90%
The rate measures the site's sourcing discipline on the kinds the citation structure covers. A post without a primary source is unfinished sourcing work by the site, whatever its subject.
| Languages | 30 |
|---|---|
| Writing scripts | 34 |
| Published language relationships | 50 |
The total joins three different kinds of record. The parts are stated separately on the card so the join is never hidden.
| Baha'i | 7 |
|---|---|
| Buddhism | 5 |
| Christianity | 60 |
| Hinduism | 10 |
| Indigenous and Traditional | 4 |
| Islam | 7 |
| Jainism | 4 |
| Judaism | 11 |
| Secular and Interfaith | 10 |
| Shinto | 4 |
| Sikhism | 7 |
| Zoroastrianism | 4 |
The calendar counts the observances the site has documented. A tradition with few entries is less documented here, not less observant in the world.
Target: Trending to zero
The backlog is the review work the site owes once its reviewers are named. Its size reflects the appointment's standing, not the entities assessed.
Every number on this page describes the state of this site's documentation. A tradition with low coverage here is less documented so far, not lesser in itself. Coverage is not truth, sourcing is not agreement, and no number on this page is a verdict on any faith, any text, or any community. No single score combines these numbers, and none is kept anywhere on the site.
| Level 1, world views | 13 |
|---|---|
| Level 2, branches | 53 |
| Level 3, families | 33 |
| Level 4, bodies and schools | 78 |
| Level 5, movements | 3 |
An entity count describes the shape of the site's own registry. It says nothing about the size or standing of any tradition in the world.
| History events | 579 |
|---|---|
| Notable Triads | 105 |
| Favorite Scripture | 30 |
| FAQ | 17 |
| Traditions | 24 |
| News | 9 |
| Impact Today | 5 |
A post count measures the archive's volume, not its completeness; a section can hold many posts and still lack whole subjects.
| Apologetics | 20 |
|---|---|
| Bioethics | 7 |
| Christian World View | 9 |
| Creation | 15 |
| Ethics and Moral Theology | 11 |
| General Theology | 6 |
| Science | 8 |
The register counts the works the site has formally cited. It is not a bibliography of the subject, and inclusion is not an endorsement of a work's conclusions.
| Languages | 30 |
|---|---|
| Writing scripts | 34 |
| Published language relationships | 50 |
The total joins three different kinds of record. The parts are stated separately on the card so the join is never hidden.
| Baha'i | 7 |
|---|---|
| Buddhism | 5 |
| Christianity | 60 |
| Hinduism | 10 |
| Indigenous and Traditional | 4 |
| Islam | 7 |
| Jainism | 4 |
| Judaism | 11 |
| Secular and Interfaith | 10 |
| Shinto | 4 |
| Sikhism | 7 |
| Zoroastrianism | 4 |
The calendar counts the observances the site has documented. A tradition with few entries is less documented here, not less observant in the world.
An entry count measures the art section's volume. It does not rank traditions by their art, and a tradition with no figural art is documented by its profiles, not by entries it cannot have.
| Comparative and Interfaith Approaches | 4 |
|---|---|
| Contextual and Advocacy Hermeneutics | 10 |
| Historical-Critical Methods | 6 |
| Integrative and Contemporary Frameworks | 3 |
| Literary, Rhetorical, and Social-Scientific Approaches | 7 |
| Philosophical Hermeneutics | 5 |
| Premodern and Classical Schools | 5 |
| Reception History and the History of Interpretation | 4 |
| Theological and Canonical Approaches | 10 |
The Methods section is in preparation, so this metric is registered before its computation exists; no number is rendered until the records stand.
A library count measures what the site has catalogued. It does not measure the worth of the collections named.
The directory counts the organizations it presents. Absence from the directory is an absence from the site's work, not from the world.
| Taxonomy tags on records | 4253 |
|---|---|
| Language relationships | 50 |
| Schism results | 16 |
| Diptych binding relations | 126 |
The total joins four kinds of relationship, and the parts are stated on the card. A relationship records a connection the site asserts; it is not a measure of any tradition's connectedness in the world.
Target: 100% of published entities
Completeness measures the review work the site has finished. Every verdict stands at Not yet reviewed until the named reviewers are appointed, so this number is expected to stand at zero and to say so.
Target: At least 80%
The rate measures whether the site's methods are usable, not whether a method is sound; soundness belongs to the Methods section's own presentation.
Target: 100%
Coverage measures how much of the language fabric the site has documented. A language without a relationship row is undocumented here, not unrelated in the world.
Target: 100%
The rate measures the completeness of records Red and the site are still verifying. A draft is unfinished editorial work, and its presence here is not a claim about any tradition's origins.
Target: 100% documented in full
This number measures the completeness of the site's own history documentation. It is not a measure of any world view's history, importance, or truth.
Target: At least 90%
The rate measures the site's sourcing discipline on the kinds the citation structure covers. A post without a primary source is unfinished sourcing work by the site, whatever its subject.
Target: At least 90%
Secondary coverage measures whether the site shows its scholarly company. It does not certify agreement with the sources named.
Target: 0
A stale version is unfinished migration work by the site. It is not a defect in the entity assessed.
Target: Within 24 hours
A metrics page that is stale is itself a data-quality failure, and this number exists so the page must say so.
Target: 0
An untagged post is invisible to the site's own cross-referencing. The defect is in the site's tagging, never in the post's subject.
Target: 0
An orphan entity is a break in the site's own tree. The entity's tradition did not cause it.
Target: 0
A dangling relationship is rot in the site's own fabric. The relationship's subject did not cause it.
Target: 0
An empty term is a promise the site has not kept yet. It is listed so the taxonomy stays honest about its own shape.
Target: 0 uncollapsed without justification
The count is a review list for the site's editors. A single-child parent is often right; the rule is that it must be justified, not that it must go.
Target: Tracked, kept small
Each such mark is a call the site has openly deferred. The count measures the site's unfinished analysis, and the standard is that it stays small and shrinks.
Target: 100%
The note is the site's guard against presenting any tradition as a monolith. The rate measures the site's use of its own guard.
Target: Reported; rising is not a failure
A disputed placement is the site recording a genuine scholarly disagreement about where an entity belongs. A rising count is not a failure; hiding one would be.
Target: 100%
Reachability measures the site's navigation, not an entity's importance. An unreachable entity is a defect in the tree's joinery.
Target: Trending to zero
The backlog is the review work the site owes once its reviewers are named. Its size reflects the appointment's standing, not the entities assessed.
Target: 100%
Validity measures the site's syndication plumbing. A broken feed is an engineering defect, and its subjects are not described by it.
This family's metrics stand defined in the definitions, and their computation connects to the site's data in the adjustment layer. No number is rendered for them until it can be computed truthfully.
The gaps are part of the report. This panel stands open, never collapsed, and names where the archive is thinnest and what the site is withholding and why.
This list measures the site's documentation arrears. A world view's place on it describes the site's work, and it is published precisely so the arrears are visible rather than buried.
The list names editorial arrears the site owes named reviewers. A record's wait describes the site's queue, not the record's worth.
Traffic data is not connected to this computation, so this list cannot be ranked and none is presented in its place. Connecting it is registered work, and its absence is stated here rather than filled with a substitute.
Traffic data is not connected to this computation, and the panel says so in place of the list rather than present a substitute ranking as if it were this one. The absence is itself one of the archive's honest gaps.
| Buddhism | 11 |
|---|---|
| Christianity | 87 |
| Confucianism | 5 |
| Daoism | 6 |
| Hinduism | 19 |
| Islam | 16 |
| Jainism | 5 |
| Judaism | 8 |
| Secular and Non-Theistic Worldviews | 5 |
| Shinto | 7 |
| Sikhism | 6 |
| The Bahá'í Faith | 1 |
| Zoroastrianism | 4 |
The count measures the review appointment's standing. It is published so the site's largest single backlog is visible on the public page, as the directive requires.
| Held under the Indigenous consent framework: a community's foundational histories publish only with that community's granted consent | 10 |
|---|
Withholding under the consent framework is the site keeping its word to the communities concerned. The count exists so the withholding is open, never silent.
Every number on this page is defined in the metric definitions: what it measures, how it is computed, what it excludes, who owns it, and what it does not mean.
