Science, Technology & Worldviews

Science and technology are never received raw. Every tradition on this site has met them with a worldview; a settled account of what the world is, what a person is, and what knowledge is for; and has answered them out of it: embracing, regulating, resisting, reinterpreting. This section tells that story era by era, keeps a register of the traditions' recorded stances toward particular technologies with their reasons attached, profiles each tradition's posture, and gathers the live flashpoints where the answers now carry deadlines. Its baseline is the complexity thesis: particular people, institutions, and disputes; never the war of two abstractions.

Showing the Jewish family only. Show everything

The Eras

Fourteen eras, told in the order the evidence gives: particular people, institutions, and disputes; never two armies. Each era names its domains, its worldview stakes, and the places elsewhere on this site where its story continues.

c. 1900–2000 Twentieth Century Relativity, quantum theory, and a priest’s Big Bang; war made science a state enterprise and the scientist’s conscience a public problem; creation-evolution litigation defined the American quarrel while genetics under Lysenko showed the cost of policing conclusions. Era · Physics, Astronomy and cosmology, Biology and evolution, Medicine and anatomy, Warfare

Flashpoints

The live questions, where the traditions' answers now carry engineering deadlines.

Flashpoint Artificial intelligence and human dignity Learning systems that counsel, accompany, and target: the live question is not machine consciousness but what may never be delegated; and every tradition on this site answers that accountability stays with persons. Catholic, Jewish, Buddhist, Secular and naturalist Flashpoint Gene editing and the germline Easy technique, unconsenting subject, speculative benefit: the 2018 edited babies drew one condemnation in many vocabularies, and the line between somatic therapy and germline design is now the field’s governing border. Catholic, Jewish, Islamic, Hindu, Buddhist, Secular and naturalist Flashpoint Transhumanism and the body Mortality as an engineering backlog: lifespan, cognition, and the body as a draft to be revised; and the counter-question, asked in every dialect on this site, whether a self indefinitely revisable remains a self. Orthodox, Catholic, Jewish, Buddhist, Secular and naturalist Flashpoint Digital technology and community Attention as the substance of community: streaming congregations and phone fasts, the industry’s own defectors making the ascetic argument, and the placement rules of the Amish applied to the pocket screen. Anabaptist, Mennonite, and Amish, Catholic, Jewish, Secular and naturalist Flashpoint Nuclear weapons and the conscience of physics The makers’ own second thoughts are part of the record: the Franck Report, Pugwash, the 1983 pastoral, and a stance inside one tradition that moved from conditional tolerance to condemnation of possession within one lifetime. Catholic, Jewish, Mainline Protestant, Secular and naturalist Flashpoint The limits of medicine The ventilator meets the ars moriendi: a working consensus against vitalism, hospice as a shared institution with Christian roots, and the assisted-dying argument proceeding jurisdiction by jurisdiction through every tradition’s courts of conscience. Catholic, Orthodox, Jewish, Islamic, Buddhist, Mainline Protestant

The Technology Register

16 technologies, each with the traditions' recorded stances and their reasons. Open the register · Compare traditions on one technology

Tradition Profiles

Profile Jewish The Sabbath as the first technology rule; a responsa tradition that answers new medicine case by case under pikuach nefesh, the saving of life; and a Maimonidean rule for cosmology; if the demonstration holds, reinterpret the text. Pikuach nefesh, Refu’ah (duty to heal), Bal tashchit, Responsa

Relationship Models

How science and religion are said to relate; from Conflict to Techno-asceticism. Read the models. The baseline of this section is the Complexity model: no timeless essences, only cases.