Soteriology · Subject

Grace and free will

The study of the relation between God's grace and the human will: whether the will is bound, freed, assisted, or cooperative in salvation; the distinctions among prevenient, operating, and cooperating grace; and whether grace works by necessity, by moral persuasion, or by concurrence with a will it creates.

Historical Background

The Pelagian controversy set the terms: Pelagius ascribed the initiative to the human will instructed by law and example; Augustine answered that grace must precede and produce the good will itself, a position ratified in the West at Orange (529), which confessed that even the desire for faith is grace's work while rejecting predestination to evil. Medieval theology distinguished operating and cooperating grace in Aquinas. The Reformation polarized the question in the Erasmus and Luther exchange of 1524-25 (On the Freedom of the Will against On the Bondage of the Will). Molina's middle knowledge offered a Jesuit account of grace and freedom that Dominicans opposed in the De Auxiliis controversy (1598-1607), which Rome closed without deciding. Wesleyan prevenient grace is the question's evangelical-Arminian answer.

Scripture References

  • Ezekiel 18
  • John 6:37-44
  • Romans 9
  • Philippians 2:12-13
  • 1 Timothy 2:3-6

The Questions

The Positions on This Subject

Classical Arminianism

The grace by which God calls sinners is real and necessary, and it can be resisted and finally rejected; God does not save by overriding the human will.

Eastern Orthodox

Salvation is synergy: the grace of God and the human will work together, grace always preceding and never coercing; neither a monergism that erases the person nor an autonomy that saves itself.

Baptist and Evangelical

Every soul is competent to approach God directly under Christ's lordship, and no church, creed, or magistrate may stand as coercive mediator in the matter of salvation.

Wesleyan-Arminian

No one is left in mere nature: prevenient grace, given to all through Christ, restores a measure of free response, awakens conscience, and draws every person toward God before any conscious turning.

Objections

Monergism is objected to as making human response a theater in which God acts on both sides. Synergism is objected to as dividing the credit for salvation between God and the creature. Middle knowledge is objected to as grounding God's knowledge in truths about creatures that nothing makes true. Each objection has been pressed for centuries without a settlement the whole church accepts.

Sources

Primary: Diotrophes (Erasmus), On the Freedom of the Will (1524); Martin Luther, On the Bondage of the Will (1525); Luis de Molina, Concordia (1588); Second Council of Orange, Canons (529).

Secondary: Eef Dekker, Middle Knowledge (Kok Pharos, 1993); Thomas P. Flint, Divine Providence: The Molinist Account (Cornell University Press, 1998).